‘The Exorcism’ Review: Russell Crowe Is Fighting Demons Again But This Time The Devil Is In The Details (2024)

‘The Exorcism’ Review: Russell Crowe Is Fighting Demons Again But This Time The Devil Is In The Details (1)

The Exorcist directed by William Friedkin and written by William Peter Blatty is considered, still, perhaps the greatest horror film of all time, certainly the most popular. The 1973 movie was even nominated for 10 Oscars and won two, unheard of in the genre at that time. It has been endlessly imitated for the past half century right up to now, recently and notably David Gordon Green’s critically reviled 2023 reboot The Exorcist: Believer, which even brought original Exorcist star Ellen Burstyn back into the fold after all these decades. But the OG is impossible to touch, so what was going through Joshua John Miller’s mind when he decided to take on a new film so closely linked to it?

Director and co-writer (with M.A. Fortin) of The Exorcism, Miller has the 1973 film in his family bones, even if he wasn’t born until a year after its release. His father is Jason Miller, the late playwright and actor who so memorably played the doomed Father Karras, who jumped out the window during the climactic exorcism, in Friedkin’s film. It brought Miller an Oscar nomination for Supporting Actor, and as his son says dad would often tell him the famous stories of the film’s making in which, lore would have it, several people connected with it died or were haunted by it in the ensuing years. Even a book has been written on all of this.

Related Stories

AcquisitionsVertical Acquires Miramax Horror Pic ‘The Exorcism’ Starring Russell Crowe
TrailersRussell Crowe’s Horror Thriller ‘The Exorcism’ Trailer Arrives

With all this background in mind, plus the demons of the Trump era in their heads. Miller and Fortin began writing The Exorcism in 2019, setting it cleverly as a movie, “The Georgetown Project”, within a movie about the making of a film eerily like The Exorcist in which the demons start to take over, particularly for the film’s leading man, Tony Miller (the last name no accident), played by Russell Crowe as a down-on-his-luck former action star beset with alcoholism and drug use because of his own demons after feeling guilty for abandoning his wife during her fatal illness, and their teen daughter Lee (Ryan Simpkins). Trying to make a professional and personal comeback, he auditions for the role of Father Arlington, the exorcist in a new film being directed by a rather tyrannical filmmaker, Peter (the middle name of 1973 film’s writer, heh heh), played by Adam Goldberg. Peter is out for authenticity and basically psychologically tortures Tony into giving him the performance he craves. As we learn in the film’s creepy opening, the original actor cast in the role mysteriously dies on the set and had to be quickly replaced. The curse is on. Or is it?

Miller and Fortin are looking for much more here than a standard exorcism film though, and much is made of Tony’s renewed attempts to win back the love and trust of his 16-year-old daughter as circumstances bring them back together and she begins to notice his crumbling condition, helping him not only at home but also on set as a production assistant. Real-life problems merge with reel-life problems as Tony’s immersion into hi character takes on unforeseen dimensions and, well, terror.

Crowe lifts this material significantly, even if it might appear to be a paycheck movie for this celebrated Oscar winner. Just a year after his starring role as a real-life Vatican priest and exorcist in the underrated The Pope’s Exorcist he is back in the genre; but fear not, it is demonstrably different as we watch Tony’s own demons get out of hand. Unfortunately for the latest film, though, it also falls prey to the tropes of the genre and sails out of control in the final third, thereby squandering its intriguing premise and succumbing to the suits who demand the stereotypical frights for this kind of movie.

Goldberg, perhaps morphing into the kind of demanding director the late great Friedkin was rumored to be in making his masterpiece, is fitfully amusing as a filmmaker with only his own needs on his mind, much to dismay of his star. Sam Worthington as Joe, a co-star who plays the sidekick for Tony, is sadly given little to work with here, as is the lively Chloe Bailey as another co-star and musician. David Hyde Pierce is earnest to a fault as the priest hired as a consultant for the film, but the character doesn’t quite seem to jell.

In the end, The Exorcism, despite the best efforts of Crowe and the initial promise of taking the familiar into unfamiliar territory, just doesn’t quite jell itself, but I will give it an Amen for the game effort.

Producers for the Miramax production are Kevin Williamson (Scream, I Know What You Did Last Summer), Bill Block and Ben Fast.

Title: The Exorcism
Distributor: Vertical
Release date: June 21, 2024
Director: Joshua John Miller
Screenwriters: Joshua John Miller and M.A. Fortin
Cast: Russell Crowe, Adam Goldberg, Ryan Simpkins, David Hyde Pierce, Chloe Bailey, Sam Worthington
Rating: R
Running time: 1 hr 33 min

‘The Exorcism’ Review: Russell Crowe Is Fighting Demons Again But This Time The Devil Is In The Details (2024)

FAQs

Is The Exorcism with Russell Crowe good? ›

Gets above 5 because Russell Crowe is good, as is David Hyde Pierce, Chloe Bailey is great, Adam Goldberg plays quite the unlikeable man in this, and it's really the performances that are good, the film is not enough, and at least it does have some good horror in it, as in a few good deaths, effects are good, it uses ...

Is Russell Crowe in two Exorcist movies? ›

Russell Crowe is going through a religious phase. In 2023, “The Pope's Exorcist” showcased the actor as — you guessed it — the Vatican's official exorcist. In “The Exorcism,” released Friday, he's at it again, this time playing a washed-up movie star cast in the role of an exorcist.

Is The Exorcist 2024 worth watching? ›

For this reason and others, “The Exorcism” becomes more of a meta-psychological thriller than a true horror film. While some creepy and unsettling events are in the film, none truly rise to a level most would recognize as horror. There are a few minor jump scares, but this film lives in its own realm.

Is The Exorcism with Russell Crowe a new movie? ›

The Exorcism—Russell Crowe's new horror movie—is playing in theaters. How soon will it be available on streaming? Released in theaters on Friday, The Exorcism stars Crowe as Tony Miller, a once-successful actor who is struggling to make a comeback because of addiction issues.

How accurate is The Exorcist? ›

While its sensationalized depiction of demonic possession has all but defined this type of narrative in the popular imagination, the material itself is loosely based on a real-life case from 1949, where Father William Bowdern performed a series of exorcisms on a 14-year-old boy.

What is The Exorcist vengeance about? ›

Why are there two versions of The Exorcist prequel? ›

Unfortunately, The Beginning wound up very poorly received, which prompted the studio to finish and release the original version, Dominion, less than a year later. If you're only going to watch one Exorcist prequel and call it good, we'd recommend skipping straight to Dominion.

Is Exorcist 1 and 2 connected? ›

In much the same way that director David Gordon Green continued the Halloween series, The Exorcist: Believer is a direct sequel to The Exorcist, although it doesn't go as far to completely rewrite the timeline. It is the start of a planned trilogy though, with The Exorcist: Deceiver to come in April 2025.

Why was The Exorcist banned? ›

From religious groups denouncing its content as immoral to audience members fainting and vomiting during its theatrical run, the overblown reaction to The Exorcist is most of the reason why it's synonymous with the phrase “scariest film ever made” despite how comparatively tame it can now appear.

Why did the new Exorcist movie get bad reviews? ›

Perhaps the film's biggest mistake is having the legacy character, Chris (Ellen Burstyn), wasted here as the studio's cliche cash grab for nostalgic fans. An overall weak script, cringe dialogue, and plenty of corny group exorcism moments to go around. The film really treats its audience like they're stupid.

Which Exorcist is the scariest? ›

1 The Exorcist (1973)

Unsurprisingly, therefore, its main exorcism scene is not just the scariest, but also the most iconic.

What is The Exorcism 2024 movie about? ›

What is Russell Crowe's next movie? ›

Is The Exorcist 2024 a sequel? ›

The filmmaker and producers say their new movie is not a sequel to any previous Exorcist film and that it charts a new course for the legendary franchise. The previous movie in the series, The Exorcist: Believer, flailed with just $65.5M U.S./Canada and $136.2M worldwide.

Is The Exorcist vengeance worth watching? ›

An uneven tone and underdeveloped suspense prevent the supernatural horror mystery from reaching success. Content collapsed. If you've ever wondered what a cheap knockoff of William Friedkin's The Exorcist would look like if it starred Charles Bronson, Exorcist Vengeance is the picture for you.

Is Pope's Exorcist worth watching? ›

Dominus Crowe! The Pope's Exorcist is standard-issue holy horror in most respects, but its star's sanctified performance will be the answer to some viewers' prayers. The Pope's Exorcist may not be a classic, but it's still a solid possession thriller -- and Russell Crowe does a fantastic job in the leading role.

Is The Exorcist series worth watching? ›

Fox's series, The Exorcist, subverts expectations, offering a deeper and more complex story than the film sequel Believer. The show successfully pays homage to the legacy of the original film by introducing familiar characters in a fresh and impactful way.

Is it a good idea to watch The Exorcist? ›

Any parent should keep this movie away from kids. It may be a classic, but it's a mature classic. This movie is very complex when it comes to religion, but also incredibly scary to some people to this day.

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Recommended Articles
Article information

Author: Madonna Wisozk

Last Updated:

Views: 5898

Rating: 4.8 / 5 (48 voted)

Reviews: 87% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Madonna Wisozk

Birthday: 2001-02-23

Address: 656 Gerhold Summit, Sidneyberg, FL 78179-2512

Phone: +6742282696652

Job: Customer Banking Liaison

Hobby: Flower arranging, Yo-yoing, Tai chi, Rowing, Macrame, Urban exploration, Knife making

Introduction: My name is Madonna Wisozk, I am a attractive, healthy, thoughtful, faithful, open, vivacious, zany person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.